NEW THINKING:
(full story)
Why Award Winning Websites Are So Awful ...
Practical and functional Websites rarely win
prizes for design but they do win sales and
profits. Here's why...
Recently, I did a masterclass on Web sales
with about 50 Danish Web managers. I gave them a
list of issues and asked them to choose the most
important ones for them. The top 5 issues for
these managers were: Increase sales,
Customer-focused, Usability, Completing the
sale, Serving customers better.
Then I asked them to look at the list again,
and this time choose the issues that were of
least importance to them. These were: Credit
card fraud, More use of Flash, Award-winning
Website, Wow factor, More animation.
The Danes (and other Scandinavians) are
probably the most sophisticated Web
practitioners I have had the pleasure to deal
with. When I deal with countries that are at the
bottom of the curve when it comes to Web
adoption and ecommerce expertise, award-winning
Websites driven by Flash and wow factors tend to
be top of the agenda.
"I no longer enter my agency's layouts in the
contests by the art director's societies, for
fear that one of them might be disgraced by an
award," David Ogilvy wrote in his 1963 seminal
book, Confessions of an Advertising Man. This
legend of advertising stated that "I wage war on
art-directoritis, the disease which reduces
advertising campaigns to impotence."
Inspired by David Ogilvy's wisdom, I decided
to visit Ogilvy.com. There I was presented by
another quote from the great man: "You aren't
advertising to a standing army, you are
advertising to a moving parade." And right
underneath that quote,
Ogilvy.com is boasting
about how it has just won 13 awards.
In fact, rarely have I come across a more
vain, conceited homepage. In about 110 words,
the name Ogilvy (or Ogilvy & Mather) is used
over 20 times. Other phrases include "our work"
and "what we do".
Nathan Shedroff recently gave a talk at User
Interface 11, where he asked the audience to
name areas of life where good design has made a
real impact. (Nathan is the co-author of a book
on experience design called Making Meaning.)
Design innovations such as wireless, voting
systems, nutrition fact sheets, starting a car,
were mentioned.
Nathan mused that they could spend an hour
mentioning really important design innovations
and have a very long list. In his opinion,
nothing on this list would have won a design
award. Nathan showed an image of the iPod, that
he described as a white block with rounded
corners. Absolutely functional design. Just like
the Google homepage.
The Danes understand that a Website needs to
be designed for the customer, not for the
organization, and certainly not for the Web
team. The most dangerous thing that Web
professionals can do is assume that what they
really care about is what their customers really
care about.
The Web is a functional, practical place. A
great Website drives the customer to act. It
uses clear, substantial language, rather than
clever, meaningless words. To quote David Ogilvy
again: "When Aeschines spoke, they said, 'How
well he speaks.' But when Demosthenes spoke,
they said, 'Let us march against Philip.' I'm
with Demosthenes."
The shiny surface wins awards. Real substance
wins customers.
Republished with
permission from Gerry McGovern, international
authority on Website effectiveness and content
management solutions. You can contact
Gerry directly by sending an e-mail to
gerry@gerrymcgovern.com or visit his Website
at
http://www.gerrymcgovern.com and subscribe
to his newsletter NEW THINKING by sending an
e-mail to
mailto:subscribe@gerrymcgovern.mailer1.net
|